Conclusions
|
| 4.41 |
The Department considers that Onchan Village
has grown quite considerably in the last few decades to such an
extent that it spreads very visibly as an extension to Douglas
from the golf course in the east to open countryside at Little
Mill and Ballachrink. The Department considers that Onchan should
not be permitted to spread any further into the surrounding countryside
and that development opportunities should be maximised within the
built-up part of the village. This Section on Residential development
is intended to present a balanced approach to the provision of
land for housing whilst bearing in mind infrastructural constraints
such as schooling.
|
| 4.42 |
There is often pressure or demands for the development
of new dwellings in the countryside. Often these are associated with
the running of a viable farm or the renovation and use of an existing
structure, both of which are provided for and dealt with in the Department's
Circulars 3/88 and 3/89. Aside from these cases there is throughout
the Island a general policy against the development of new dwellings
in the countryside (as set out in Planning Circular 1/88) and there
is to be no exception (excepting those few sites previously identified)
in the case of the countryside which surrounds the built up part
of Onchan in order that the natural undeveloped nature of the countryside
is not undermined. |
| 4.43 |
Also, there are other pockets of land on the periphery
which may be seen by some as suitable for infill development. There
are many such pieces of land, for example within Little Mill or on
the Scollag Road where it would be physically possible to accommodate
more dwellings. However, it is considered that at present the built
up part of Onchan eases into the surrounding countryside quite subtly
at these points and the gradual transition between village and country
where the number and frequency of dwellings decreases as one proceeds
further from the village should be protected and not eroded by the
introduction of new buildings. Furthermore, in particular, in this
respect it was considered that the piece of land which lies between
Larch Hill and Clucas' Laundry which is currently within a wider
zone of Predominantly Residential land use on the 1982 Development
Plan Order should be rezoned to Open Space. However, this site was
the subject of PA 98/0608 where it was resolved at Appeal that the
site was suitable for residential development and that with suitable
landscaping proposals and sufficient distance separating the buildings
and associated domestic curtilages from the trees a satisfactory
development could be achieved. As such this site is now included
as suitable for residential development. |
| 4.44 |
It should be noted that the previous drafts of this local plan
contained a requirement that a minimum of three car parking spaces
be provided with any new residential development in Onchan. The
Inspector appointed to hear the public inquiry commented that this
was inappropriate and that the Department should rely upon the
standard set out in the Isle of Man Planning Scheme (Development
Plan) Order 1982 which requires 1.5 spaces to be provided per unit,
preferably behind the building line. It is pertinent to note that
if 1.5 spaces are to be provided behind the building line and the
building line is the standard distance of five or six metres from
the highway, there will be two and a half spaces provided in any
case and the requirement for three spaces is not a significant
increase over and above what is currently being required. The Department
is however, obliged to take account of changing circumstances in
Onchan and in particular the rise in residential development and
car ownership and the reliance upon the motor car by many residents
for transport to and from work. It has been observed that many
of the residential areas in Onchan now experience significantly
more on-street car parking than was the case in previous years
despite the application of the 1.5 space policy and in order to
avoid congestion of residential roads in this way, the Department
considers that in Onchan it is appropriate to increase the requirement
for car parking to a minimum of three spaces per dwelling unit.
Whilst there is some merit in having an Island-wide standard, conditions
and circumstances vary considerably from area to area. As Onchan
is within convenient driving distance of the capital and appears
to have a relatively high level of car ownership, it is felt that
the Inspector did not properly understand the car parking problems
which Onchan faces. Consequently the Department does not accept
the Inspector's recommendation to apply a standard which is applied
throughout the Island - namely 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit - and
at that a standard which was introduced over seventeen years ago.
It should be noted that local plans are intended to look in some
detail at local demands and pressures and in this respect this
is what this policy intends to achieve. It is also particularly
relevant that this policy is supported by both Onchan District
Commissioners and the Department of Transport.
As such, bearing in mind the above points, it is considered that
the following policies are suitable for Onchan with respect to
residential development:
|
| O/RES/P/1 |
| 4.45 |
DOUGLAS BAY HOTEL SITE - Area 3
THIS SITE WILL BE CONSIDERED SUITABLE FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
OF EITHER INDIVIDUAL DWELLINGS OR APARTMENTS. ANY DEVELOPMENT
MUST BE SYMPATHETIC TO THE PROMINENT LOCATION AND A BUILDING
OF EQUAL PROMINENCE AND OF A HIGH STANDARD OF DESIGN WILL BE
EXPECTED TO DOMINATE THE SITE. EACH RESIDENTIAL UNIT MUST HAVE
AT LEAST THREE CAR PARKING SPACES ALLOCATED THERETO ALTHOUGH
CONSIDERATION WILL BE PAID TO THE NUMBER OF BEDROOMS AND THE
SIZE OF UNITS WHERE APARTMENTS ARE PROPOSED.
|
| O/RES/P/2 |
| 4.46 |
MAJESTIC HOTEL SITE - Area 4
DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SITE FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES WILL BE PERMITTED
WHERE THIS COMPLIES WITH THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT BRIEF:
- provision must also be made for the servicing of the development
in terms of access and car parking which must be provided at
a ratio of at least three spaces (which may include a garage)
per dwelling. Where apartments are proposed, parking spaces
should be provided at a ratio of one space per bedroom.
- the height of the new building(s) erected between the former
hotel and King Edward Road may not exceed that of the former
Majestic Hotel that is a maximum ridge height (excluding chimneys)
of 56.00 above ordnance datum. Any buildings built on the lower
part of the site - that is between the former hotel and the
public footpath - must be reduced in height below the level
referred to above in recognition of the sloping nature of the
site.
- any detailed proposal must include a landscaping scheme
to complement the buildings proposed and to soften the impact
of the buildings proposed. Particular attention will be paid
to the impact of the development from the public footpath which
runs on the coastal side of the site and no buildings will
be permitted any closer to the footpath than 20 metres.
|
| O/RES/P/3 |
| 4.47 |
LAND BETWEEN LAKESIDE AND GROUDLE GLEN - Area 6
DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA SITUATED BETWEEN LAKESIDE GARDENS,
GROUDLE ROAD, WHITEBRIDGE ROAD AND GROUDLE GLEN WILL BE CONSIDERED
APPROPRIATE FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WHERE THE DOMINATING
FEATURE OF THE SITE IS LARGE TRACTS OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE WITH
APPROPRIATE CLUMPS OF TREE PLANTING AND PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY
THROUGHOUT THE AREAS OF OPEN SPACE. DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE SHOULD
IN ADDITION COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT BRIEF:-
- Development must be arranged in separate clusters of
buildings, each distinguished from others by open space and
tree planting. Within each cluster a variety of house types
is encouraged to minimise the impact of the buildings as
viewed from elsewhere and particularly further afield.
- Development of these clusters may only take place within
the area delineated for development with no building erected
closer than 80 metres to the Groudle River
- Each individual cluster may not exceed a density of
five dwellings per acre with no more than 61 dwellings in
total on the site.
- A variety of house types, sizes and materials should
be introduced onto the site to add interest and help reduce
the impact of the development as viewed from further afield.
- Each dwelling must have provided a minimum of three
car parking spaces at least one of which must be provided
and retained behind the building line.
|
| O/RES/P/4 |
| 4.48 |
LAND BETWEEN GROUDLE ROAD AND GROUDLE GLEN - Area 6
(Low Density Housing in Parkland)
DEVELOPMENT OF THE PIECE OF LAND WHICH LIES BETWEEN THE SITE
REFERRED TO IN 4.14 AND 4.47 ABOVE, GROUDLE GLEN, GROUDLE ROAD
AND THE BRIDGE OVER GROUDLE RIVER WILL BE CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE
FOR LOW DENSITY HOUSING IN PARKLAND IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANNING
CIRCULAR 8/89 AND WHERE NO DEVELOPMENT IS ERECTED WITHIN 80 METRES
OF THE GROUDLE RIVER. THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE SITE AND GROUDLE
ROAD MUST BE FORMED BY A SOD HEDGE - EITHER THAT WHICH CURRENTLY
EXISTS OR ONE RECONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT. THE SITE
MUST ALSO HAVE ON ITS NORTHERN PART A SIGNIFICANT AREA OF PUBLIC
OPEN SPACE CONTIGUOUS WITH THAT PROPOSED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT
OF THE ADJOINING LAND (see paragraph 4.47).
|
| O/RES/P/5 |
| 4.49 |
LAND AT HAGUE FARM - Area 7
THIS SITE MAY BE DEVELOPED FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES WHERE:-
- a mixture of house types would be encouraged with some
provision for smaller units suitable for first time buyers.
- where the development abuts existing property, new buildings
may not come closer to this mutual boundary than 10 metres
or the distance from the existing property to the mutual
boundary, whichever is the greater.
- development proposals must include provisions for children's
play facilities which must represent at least one area of
a minimum of half an acre within the site.
- development proposals must demonstrate a reduction in
the density of development toward the north western edge
of the site where this abuts the fields alongside Blackberry
Lane and a significant increase in planting to soften the
edge of the development in this part of the site.
- each dwelling must have a minimum of three car parking
spaces provided at least one of which must be provided and
retained behind the building line.
|
| O/RES/P/6 |
| 4.50 |
LAND AT RIDGEWAY ROAD - Area 9
THIS PIECE OF LAND WILL BE CONSIDERED SUITABLE FOR RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT AND THERE IS A VARIETY OF WAYS IN WHICH THE SITE
COULD BE DEVELOPED. AS RIDGEWAY ROAD IS CHARACTERISED BY DEVELOPMENT
OF SEMI-DETACHED AND TERRACED PROPERTIES WHICH FRONT ONTO RIDGEWAY
ROAD IT IS CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE TO RE-CREATE THIS TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT
ONTO RIDGEWAY ROAD ON THE SOUTH WESTERN SIDE. HOWEVER, A MORE
IMAGINATIVE SCHEME MAY BE PRODUCED BY AVOIDING A LINE OF DEVELOPMENT
PARALLEL WITH RIDGEWAY ROAD. TREE PLANTING WILL BE REQUIRED AS
PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. EACH DWELLING MUST HAVE PROVIDED A
MINIMUM OF THREE PARKING SPACES AT LEAST ONE OF WHICH MUST BE
PROVIDED AND RETAINED BEHIND THE BUILDING LINE. PROVISION FOR
SMALLER UNITS SUITABLE FOR FIRST TIME BUYERS IS ENCOURAGED.
|
| O/RES/P/7 |
| 4.51 |
PLOTS WITHIN MANOR PARK - Area 10
DEVELOPMENT OF THE REMAINING PLOTS WITHIN MANOR PARK WILL BE
PERMITTED FOR RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES WHERE SUCH DEVELOPMENT RESPONDS
TO THE STYLE AND DENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT ON EACH SIDE OF THE ROAD
AND WHERE THE AMENITIES (OUTLOOK, LIGHT AND PRIVACY) OF EXISTING
PROPERTIES WHICH ABUT THE SITE ARE NOT ADVERSELY AFFECTED.
|
| O/RES/P/8 |
| 4.52 |
LAND BEHIND GOVERNMENT HOUSE - Area 11
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MAY BE PERMITTED ON PART OF THE LAND
WHICH IS PRIMARILY RESERVED FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES, BETWEEN
GOVERNMENT HOUSE AND HEYWOOD PARK. THIS WILL ONLY BE PERMITTED
WHERE THIS LAND IS REQUIRED FOR SHELTERED HOUSING AND/OR SPECIALIST
FACILITIES FOR THE MANX BLIND WELFARE SOCIETY. DEVELOPMENT WILL
ONLY BE PERMITTED IN THE TOP PART OF THE TWO FIELDS CLOSEST TO
HEYWOOD PARK AND PROPOSALS FOR SUCH DEVELOPMENT MUST BE ACCOMPANIED
BY PROVISION OF RECREATIONAL FACILITIES FOR USE BY CHILDREN FROM
ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. PROPOSALS FOR DEVELOPMENT MUST
ALSO BE ACCOMPANIED BY PROPOSALS FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM HEYWOOD
PARK. DEVELOPMENT MUST ALSO MAKE ADEQUATE PROVISION SO AS TO
AVOID ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE OUTLOOK, PRIVACY AND LIGHT OF EXISTING
PROPERTIES WHICH ABUT THE SITE AND MUST INCLUDE SUFFICIENT SPACE
- AT LEAST 120 METRES BETWEEN THE ROADWAY AND ANY NEW BUILDING
- AND PLANTING BETWEEN THE TT COURSE AND THE NEW BUILDINGS SO
AS TO AVOID THE MERGING OF DOUGLAS AND ONCHAN AT THIS POINT.
|
| O/RES/P/9 |
| 4.53 |
KING EDWARD ROAD - Area 12
THIS SITE, ADJACENT TO "FAR END" WILL BE CONSIDERED SUITABLE
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MAXIMUM OF THREE NEW DWELLINGS. DEVELOPMENT
MUST RESPOND TO THE NATURAL CONTOURS OF THE SITE AND MUST AVOID
UNNECESSARY UNDERBUILDING OR BUILDING UP OF THE FLOOR LEVELS.
DEVELOPMENT MUST RETAIN AND ENHANCE THE PUBLIC FOOTPATH WHICH
RUNS THROUGH THE SITE. ACCESS TO THE SITE MUST BE IN THE FORM
OF A SINGLE CUL-DE-SAC FROM KING EDWARD ROAD WITH NO GRADIENT
OF ANY ROAD OR DRIVE TO EXCEED 1 IN 10. CAR PARKING MUST BE PROVIDED
AT A RATIO OF AT LEAST THREE SPACES PER DWELLING WHERE AT LEAST
ONE OF THESE IS PROVIDED AND RETAINED BEHIND THE BUILDING LINE.
|
| O/RES/P/10 |
| 4.54 |
FURMAN CLOSE - Area 13
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE ON THIS
SITE WHERE THE DENSITY IS IN KEEPING WITH THAT OF THE EXISTING
DEVELOPMENT IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY. AT LEAST THREE CAR PARKING
SPACES MUST BE PROVIDED WHERE AT LEAST ONE OF THESE IS PROVIDED
AND RETAINED BEHIND THE BUILDING LINE AND SINGLE STOREY DWELLINGS
ONLY WILL BE PERMITTED ON PLOTS WHICH BACK ONTO EXISTING SINGLE
STOREY PROPERTY.
|
| O/RES/P/11 |
| 4.55 |
BROWNSWOOD, ASHLEY HILL - Area 14
IT WILL BE ACCEPTABLE TO ERECT ONE FURTHER DWELLING WITHIN
THE EXISTING CURTILAGE OF BROWNSWOOD, ASHLEY HILL. SUCH DWELLING
MUST BE OF TRADITIONAL CHARACTER AND PROPOSALS FOR DEVELOPMENT
MUST INCLUDE NEW TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING TO SOFTEN THE IMPACT
OF THE DWELLING AS VIEWED FROM THE HIGHWAY.
|
| O/RES/P/12 |
| 4.56 |
26, GOVERNOR'S ROAD - Area 18
THIS SITE WILL BE CONSIDERED SUITABLE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
ONE DWELLING WHERE THIS DOES NOT RESULT IN THE LOSS OF TREES
OVER AND ABOVE THOSE WHICH ARE CONSIDERED NECESSARY IN THE INTERESTS
OF TREE MANAGEMENT ON THE SITE. SPECIAL ATTENTION MUST ALSO BE
PAID TO THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT ON THE TREES AFTER
BUILDING HAS BEEN COMPLETED (FOR EXAMPLE THE EFFECT OF BRANCHES
AND LEAVES ON THE COMPLETED BUILDING, ANY GROWTH WHICH MAY REASONABLY
BE EXPECTED FROM EXISTING TREES AND THE IMPACT OF TREE ROOTS
ON THE BUILDING AND VICE VERSA). AT LEAST THREE CAR PARKING SPACES
MUST BE PROVIDED WHERE AT LEAST ONE OF THESE IS PROVIDED AND
RETAINED BEHIND THE BUILDING LINE.
|
| O/RES/P/13 |
| 4.57 |
NURSERY HOTEL SITE - Area 19
DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SITE FOR THE PROVISION OF SHELTERED HOUSING
WILL BE CONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE WHERE THE DEVELOPMENT IS ADEQUATELY
SCREENED FROM THE PUBLIC CAR PARK WHICH FRONTS THE SITE. EXISTING
TREES MUST BE RETAINED WHERE POSSIBLE.
|
| O/RES/P/14 |
| 4.58 |
LOWER BALLACASHIN, ABBEYLANDS - Area 20
THE DEVELOPMENT ON ONE DWELLING WILL BE PERMITTED HERE WHERE
THE DWELLING IS SITUATED IN AMONGST THE EXISTING FARM BUILDINGS,
IS DESIGNED AS A MODEST TRADITIONAL FARM HOUSE IN COMPLIANCE
WITH THE PROVISIONS OF PLANNING CIRCULAR 3/91 POLICIES 2-7 INCLUSIVE
AND MAY INCLUDE A SINGLE STOREY DWELLING. ANY PROPOSAL FOR DEVELOPMENT
MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A LANDSCAPING SCHEME WHICH INTRODUCES
NEW TREE PLANTING OF INDIGENOUS SPECIES TO MINIMISE THE VISUAL
IMPACT OF THE DWELLING.
|
| O/RES/P/15 |
| 4.59 |
SLEGABY AND BALLCOTTIER FARMS - Area 21
THE DEPARTMENT WILL CONSIDER FAVOURABLY A PROPOSAL TO CONVERT
THE EXISTING TUCK MILL INTO LIVING ACCOMMODATION WHERE THIS RETAINS
THE FABRIC AND THE APPEARANCE AND CHARACTER OF THE EXISTING BUILDING.
THE APPLICANT IS ADVISED TO CONSULT THE DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT
AND THE ENVIRONMENT'S CONSERVATION OFFICER AND MANX NATIONAL
HERITAGE PRIOR TO THE FORMULATION OR SUBMISSION OF A PLANNING
APPLICATION.
|
| O/RES/P/16 |
| 4.60 |
SLEGABY AND BALLACOTTIER FARMS - Area 21
THE DEPARTMENT WILL CONSIDER FAVOURABLY ANY PROPOSAL WHICH
EITHER CONVERTS AND RESTORES THE LARGE STONE BARN IN THE WESTERN
CORNER OF THE FARM GROUP FOR PURPOSES OF RESIDENTIAL ACCOMMODATION,
TOURIST ACCOMMODATION OR LIGHT INDUSTRY. SUCH PROPOSALS MUST
PRESERVE THE CHARACTER AND APPEARANCE OF THE BUILDING AND MUST
INVOLVE THE DEMOLITION OF THE ADJACENT DERELICT BUILDING WHERE
SUCH MAY NOT BE REBUILT ELSEWHERE.
|
| O/RES/P/17 |
| 4.61 |
SLEGABY AND BALLACOTTIER FARMS
THE DEPARTMENT WILL ALSO CONSIDER FAVOURABLY ANY PROPOSAL FOR
THE DEMOITION OF THE LARGE BARN AT THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE GROUP
OF FARM BUILDINGS AND ITS REPLACEMENT BY A NEW SUBSTANTIAL DWELLING,
DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH POLICY 8 OF PLANNING CIRCULAR 3/91.
ANY REPLACEMENT BUILDING MUST BE FINISHED IN MANX STONE TAKEN
FROM THE DEMOLISHED STONE BARN.
|
| O/RES/P/18 |
| 4.62 |
SLEGABY AND BALLACOTTIER FARMS - Area 21
ANY PROPOSAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH POLICIES O/RES/P/15, O/RES/P/16
AND O/RES/P/17 MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY A COMPREHENSIVE SCHEME
FOR TIDYING UP THE COMPLEX AS A WHOLE AND MANAGEMENT OF THE EXISTING
WOODLAND TOGETHER WITH A SCHEME FOR NEW PLANTING IN AND AROUND
THE EXISTING TREES. APPLICANTS MUST ALSO CONSULT MANX NATIONAL
HERITAGE WITH RESPECT TO THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SENSITIVITY OF THE
SITE.
|
| O/RES/R/1 |
| 4.63 |
SLEGABY AND BALLACOTTIER FARMS - Area 21
THE DEPARTMENT WOULD ENCOURAGE THE APPLICANT IN THE PREPARATION
OF SCHEMES IN ACCORDANCE WITH POLICIES O/RES/P/15, O/RES/P/16
AND O/RES/P/17 TO CONSIDER THE INTRODUCTION OF A PUBLIC RIGHT
OF WAY THROUGH THE SITE FROM THE BALLACOTTIER ROAD TO THE CREG-NY-BAA.
|
| O/RES/P/19 |
| 4.64 |
OTHER PARTS OF ONCHAN
THE ERECTION OF NEW RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES MAY BE PERMITTED
WITHIN AREAS DESIGNATED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE THESE WOULD
FIT IN WITH THE DENSITY, MASSING, DESIGN AND CHARACTER OF EXISTING
ADJACENT DWELLINGS.
|
| O/RES/P/20 |
| 4.65 |
EXCEPT WHERE REQUIRED OTHERWISE BY THE LOCAL PLAN,
CAR PARKING STANDARDS OF AT LEAST THREE SPACES PER DWELLING WHICH
MAY INCLUDE A GARAGE WILL BE APPLIED TO ALL NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
WITHIN THE LOCAL PLAN AREA. PERMISSION WILL NOT GENERALLY BE FORTHCOMING
FOR EXTENSIONS OR CONVERSIONS WHICH RESULT IN A LOSS OF PARKING
SPACE BEHIND THE BUILDING LINE. |
| O/RES/P/21 |
| 4.66 |
EXTENSIONS AND ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
PROPERTY WILL GENERALLY NOT BE OPPOSED WHERE SUCH PROPOSALS ARE
APPROPRIATE IN TERMS OF SCALE, MASSING, DESIGN, APPEARANCE AND
IMPACT ON ADJACENT PROPERTY. |
| O/RES/P/22 |
| 4.67 |
OUTSIDE THOSE AREAS DESIGNATED FOR RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT NEW DWELLINGS WILL GENERALLY NOT BE PERMITTED WITHIN
THE LOCAL PLAN AREA. THIS APPLIES PARTICULARLY TO THE RURAL PART
OF THE DISTRICT WHERE THE COUNTRYSIDE IS ALREADY PROTECTED BY PLANNING
CIRCULAR 1/88 THE PROVISIONS OF WHICH WILL CONTINUE TO BE APPLIED.
IN ADDITION IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE COUNTRYSIDE IN ITS ENTIRETY
WITHIN THE DISTRICT IS DESIGNATED BY THE LOCAL PLAN AS OF HIGH
LANDSCAPE VALUE AND SCENIC SIGNIFICANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
PROVISIONS OF THE ISLAND STRATEGIC PLAN EASTERN SECTOR (PLANNING
CIRCULAR 9/91). |
| O/RES/R/2 |
| 4.68 |
ALL NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MUST COMPLY WITH
THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT'S BOOKLET, "MANX ROADS". |